Called into Her Arms

Actions for the Realization of a New Age of Aquamerian Equanimity

In the case where Articles similar to this one, calling our representatives in the Senate of the United States, as well as other Representatives, proved less than compelling; we may turn to the “independent tribunals of justice [that] consider themselves in a peculiar manner the guardians of [our] rights,” by following the process detailed here to submit them to our treasured Court.[1] Submitting emergency applications thereto, for the preservation of freedom and the protection of democracy. Amounting to regular acts of self-governance by applicants as fellow members of the Republic, enacted in normal maintenance of our Constitution, “to render the constitution of the federal government adequate to exigencies of the Union,” and for perfection of our mutually pledged as well as entitled interest therein.[2]

Whereas, selected by the State Legislatures, as opposed to elected by the People, the Senate of 1789 moved hastily to amend the “Articles to be proposed as Amendments to the Constitution of the United States” (our Government of the Federation, or Union), they did so as to eliminate both freedom of religion and the right to a trial by a jury of our peers (among other items, including specific protections in the form of positive rights protecting our great rights of conscience; which are the most solemnly missed and heartfeltly absent to-day; see here).

Fortunately, a conference of six Managers hailing from both the Senate and the House, including James Madison, convened to recover some of our most treasured, but not all of our most sacred and undeniable natural human rights. Furthermore, the form of the amendments, being appended to, rather than interwoven into the original Constitution, has proceeded to have the effects predicted by Madison and others; and to the great detriment of the People in their pursuit of the common good as well as general happiness.[3]

So much so, in fact, that Chief Justice Roberts wrote “it is the role of the supreme Court in our constitutional system that is at stake,” in an Opinion concurring a judgment in part and dissenting in part. Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson, 595 U. S. (2021). Whereas, his statement predates later Decisions concerning the topic of constitutional human rights already protected under the constitution, his point and the purpose of the said applications be founded in the most fundamental of concerns considering our way of life, as Americans, and indeed our Governments.

That is, as much as the factitious gravitas of a populous calamity shall undoubtedly clamor otherways, the same applications would not be principally concerned with the human right to make self-managed health care decisions—but the pursuit of life, of liberty, and of happiness and safety generally.

Impervious to the imperfections of government, as it has been since the day our Declaratory Charter was executed nearly 250 years ago, our Republic remains uncompromised. As guided by George Washington on more than one occasion, including in his farewell address, we must resist the urge to alter the principles of the Constitution of our Government for the United States of America, while making such regular acts in the maintenance thereof.[4]

Whereas, our Republic is both composed of and comprised by us, the People of these many States of America united, and woven into one nation of her Country. Having a population that is roughly half men (or male) and half women (or female), where the latter are said to hold a thin majority; yet in several of our sister states they find themselves denied the power (or right) that most rightly defines a Republican Form of Government,— that is the right to govern ourselves federally, through the representative-democracy administrable to the whole. Trenching completely upon the recitals clause of our Constitution and constituting, perhaps, a breach of the protection against domestic violence that is Guaranteed under that instrument’s Fourth Article.[5]

Where, we may move as men and women for our Union and the women and men of said sister states, doing so “in virtue of a power constitutionally given by the whole community, and such authority when exercised, is in effect an act of the whole community which forms such body politic.” Penhallow v. Doane’s Administrators, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 54 (1795).[6]

Relying primarily on the constitution, as amended, of the United States Governments for the United States of America, our Republic,[7] and additionally our home state’s Ratification[8] thereof, as well as certain other Authorities,[9] including the the New York Constitution[10] and reasonableness test established elsewhere.

Calling for emergency injunctive relief e.g., dictatorially narrowing the Decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (597 U.S. 215 (2022) available here), to cases where sex-determinant factors are absent, while more permanent remedies are further considered, including the adoption of James Madison’s originally proposed amendments to the Constitution (June 8, 1789). Preferring to enact as acts of regular self-governance in maintenance of our Constitution for the United States of America, respectfully instructing our representatives to convene a Committee on the whole state of the Union, concerned with those presents made June 8, 1789 both as to their substance and form (available here); as compared to the amendments ultimately proposed to the States for their adoption.

Respectfully reminding our public servants that they hold offices representing us, and that we are under no obligation to further prove our “original and supreme will” (or right) to self-govern. Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803).[11] We the fellow anti-factional members of her Republic, as hamiltonian-madisonians and republican-democrats of this Country so dear to us all, deciduously applying ourselves to submit such applications, with perfection of her freedom and happiness being our most ardent wish.

Where the free press exists because without them, not so much as a saber being rattled, the Republic could be suspended; this article and any such application may be like the scaffolding that is no longer needed once the structure has been restored.[12]

Letting us hereby remember that on July 4, 1776 the quill was mightier than all swords, all guns, and every cannon. That if thirty-five words, said by some, to this day, to be the most important written in the English language, can liberate a hemisphere of civilization after nearly two millennia of bondage, surely rereading them may bind up our wounds.

By understanding that the Declaration of Independence isn’t merely prefixed to the head of the Constitution by the words We, the People, it is the “Declaratory Charter” of our cherished Republic, less than two months from turning 250, on July 4, 2026.

Where to reduce our Constitution to its true form, a “Bill of Powers” strictly limiting all governmental actions, may be too much; to become a whole People again, all of whom recognize the “great residuum of rights” remains in the just and able hands of the People, is, perhaps, necessary (Madison, June 8, 1789).

Writing here in counter to the digital ad revenue inducing methodologies of modern institutional journalism, which are designed to divide us under some other understanding, with the aim of targeting our individual wallets, rather than bolstering our hearts or improving our minds; such that the elements of every supreme Court decision that are most likely to irk any one of us in particular, land in our inboxes and social media feeds. Wherefore it be true, that our treasured Court, “possesses neither the sword nor the purse,”[13] as it bears the gavel, we do the pen.

For the profound truth of the Formation Document of Our Republic & Charter of Natural Rights (the Declaration of Independence), is that we rely on Nature for the conditions of our existence; where to forget it, is to lose her, and yet to remember her, is to realize that she’s been there all along.

Be the cause, that for our part, our Right to apply ourselves, having consulted with one another, in prayer to the Senate hereby, in lieu of petitioning formally as said applications, in the name and behalf of the State Legislature of New-York; shall not be abridged, nor will our neighbors’ be invaded.[14]

---

~~

With the deepest respect and the highest re-guards, We have the honor of aspiring to be, Your most humble students and obedient assistants, in these seas of airs, America,

REPUBLIA

NATURE IS TRUTH

---

[1] Madison, James (June 8, 1789). See; The Debates and Proceedings in the Congress of the United States; with an Appendix, containing Important Papers and Public Documents and All the Laws of a Public nature; with a Copious Index. Volume I, Comprising (with Volume II) the Period from March 3, 1789, to March 3, 1791, Inclusive. Compiled from Authentic Materials, by Joseph Gales, Senior. Washington: Printed and Published by Gales and Seaton. 1834. https://www.congress.gov/annals-of-congress/volume-1.pdf (accessed December 25, 2024).

[2] Hamilton, Alexander. Annapolis Convention. Address of the Annapolis Convention, 14 September 1786, (https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Hamilton/01-03-02-0556) [accessed April 8, 2026].

[3] Madison, James (June 8, 1789). See; The Debates and Proceedings in the Congress of the United States; with an Appendix, containing Important Papers and Public Documents and All the Laws of a Public nature; with a Copious Index. Volume I, Comprising (with Volume II) the Period from March 3, 1789, to March 3, 1791, Inclusive. Compiled from Authentic Materials, by Joseph Gales, Senior. Washington: Printed and Published by Gales and Seaton. 1834. https://www.congress.gov/annals-of-congress/volume-1.pdf (accessed December 25, 2024).

[4] Washington, George (Hamilton, Alexander; Madison, James), George Washington’s Farewell Address, Newspaper, Postscript to the Virginia Herald, & c. No. 558. 9 September 1796, https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/Washingtons_Farewell_Address.pdf (accessed December 25, 2024).

[5] Article IV., Sect. 4., “The United States, shall guarantee to every State in this Union, a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and, on application of the Legislature or of the Executive, (when the Legislature cannot be convened,) against domestic violence.” (https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript#4-4) [accessed May 2026].

[6] Paterson, J., Penhallow v. Doane’s Administrators, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 54 (1795), https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep003/usrep003054/usrep003054.pdf (December 28, 2024)

[7] A new kind of State at the time it was founded by Declaratory Charter (4 July, 1776)

[8] The Ratification of the Proposed Constitution of the United States by the state of New York (26 July, 1788), https://history.nycourts.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Publications_NY-Ratification-compressed.pdf (accessed 25 Dec. 2024).

[9] https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-463_3ebh.pdf

[10] See e.g., NY Const art III § 13. New York State Constitution. As revised, including amendments effective January 1, 2024, https://dos.ny.gov/system/files/documents/2024/09/constitution-january-1-2024.pdf (accessed 25 Dec. 2024).

[11] https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep005/usrep005137/usrep005137.pdf

[12] “Scaffolding that is no longer needed once the structure has been restored it” paraphrases Carmine Gorga (Economist).

[13] Roberts, C.J. “2024 Year End Report on the Federal Judiciary.” Paraphrasing Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist Papers: No. 78, (https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/year-end/2024year-endreport.pdf) [accessed April 8, 2026].

[14] Article of the First (Amendment) amending, in addition to, and amendment of, the Constitution of the General Government and Federal Government of the United States, for the many United States of America (our Republic).

---